Part 27
“Subhuti, if you entertain the thought that the Realised One attained unexcelled complete perfect enlightenment through not holding the marks of perfection, you should not think this way. Subhuti, if you entertain the thought that those who aspire to unexcelled complete perfect enlightenment should say that all things are extinguished and annihilated, you should not think this way. Why? Those who aspire to unexcelled complete perfect enlightenment ought not say that all things are extinguished and annihilated.”

Commentary:
It is true that he who attained unexcelled complete perfect enlightenment never dwells on not only the marks of perfection but also all other things. However, not dwelling on anything doesn’t mean thinking of all things as extinguished and annihilated, but means looking upon them as the function of the true-Self. For example, when we see waves in the sea, thinking that each of the waves has its own unique nature and is different from the others in essence is dwelling on things, and seeing all the waves as nothing whatsoever is seeing all things as extinguished and annihilated. In fact, this is another type of dwelling on the image of nothing. However, he who sees everything as empty, or as it is and never dwells on anything, sees everything just as the constant function of the true-Self that is formless, boundless, changeless and nameless, is one who sees everything as it is.
Student: “Why is it that those who aspire to unexcelled complete perfect enlightenment ought not say that all things are extinguished and annihilated?”
Master: “If all things were extinguished and annihilated, who would ask whom like this?”
©Boo Ahm
All writing ©Boo Ahm. All images ©Simon Hathaway









